However, in the seeing of a tree for instance,
there is no seer and there is no seen. There is no inside
‘I’ that sees and there is no outside ‘tree’ that is seen.
there is no seer and there is no seen. There is no inside
‘I’ that sees and there is no outside ‘tree’ that is seen.
The ‘I’ and the ‘tree’ are concepts superimposed by thinking
onto the reality of the experience, which in this case could simply be called
‘seeing’.
onto the reality of the experience, which in this case could simply be called
‘seeing’.
It is thinking alone that divides the seamless intimacy of experiencing
into a subject and an object, into an ‘I’ that sees and a ‘tree’
that is seen. However, awareness, or ‘I’ and the reality of the tree
are not two separate experiences.
They are one.
into a subject and an object, into an ‘I’ that sees and a ‘tree’
that is seen. However, awareness, or ‘I’ and the reality of the tree
are not two separate experiences.
They are one.
…The experience of beauty is the dissolution of the apparent ‘objectness’
of the object and the ‘subjectness’ of our self,
leaving only the seamless intimacy of experiencing.
of the object and the ‘subjectness’ of our self,
leaving only the seamless intimacy of experiencing.
~ Rupert Spira
from Presence - Volume II
0 comments:
Post a Comment